Postgraduate "Work In Progress" Seminar
Postgraduate Work-In-Progress SeminarA weekly seminar for Philosophy postgraduates to present their in-progress work, followed by a well-spirited trip to the pub. OverviewThe WIP provides a risk-free and supportive space for postgraduates to present their work and receive feedback from other graduates and faculty.
Attendance optional but highly recommended. All postgraduates are welcome to present or attend -- whether MA, MPhil, PhD, Visitors, etc. Useful InfoThe WIP is a unique opportunity for graduates to develop their presenting and writing skills, take risks, test out ideas, and receive constructive feedback from peers.
Presentations need not be watertight or polished pieces at all. You are encouraged to present work at all stages of the writing process. Should you present?Are you a postgraduate? Then yes, you should present. |
NEXT TALKRozemin Keshvani (PhD) Kant Thursday 25/06/2026 5pm - 6:15pm S1.50 ORGANISERS |
|
|
|
CRPLA Seminar: Victoria Rimell (91¸£Àû), 'Philosophers' stone: enduring Niobe' (Note change to hybrid event!)
Niobe, daughter of Tantalus and wife of Amphion king of Thebes, the lesser-known point of comparison for Antigone in Sophocles’ tragedy, was the hyper-fertile mother of either 12 or 14 children. When she boasted of her maternal superiority to Leto, mother only of the twins Apollo and Diana/Artemis, Leto punished her by ordering Apollo and Artemis to murder all her offspring, before Niobe was whisked back to her homeland and transformed into a weeping rock on Mt Sipylus. As her story is told in its longest surviving narrative form, in book 6 of Ovid’s Metamorphoses, Niobe the weeping rock seems to epitomise the limit of the human where metamorphosis is located, Lacan’s ‘zone between two deaths’. In A. Benjamin’s response to Hegel’s Niobe in Towards a Relational Ontology, she is ‘that other who, in standing in stone on the outside, complicates assimilation insofar as she is positioned outside any structure of recognition’. In opposition to the Virgin Mary, who stands in Hegel for, as Benjamin puts it, ‘that specific logic of love’ in which ‘love is positioned by the necessity of its accession to universality in which reconciliation, completion, and self-sacrifice occur’ (131), Niobe is ‘impossible to love’, or renders impossible an ethics or politics based on love, defined as a being-at-one-with-the-other. In this paper, I take up the challenge that Benjamin seems both to acknowledge and elide, that of being alongside Niobe not (only) in her hubris, her rage and in the initial impact of her children’s murder, but in her final state of perpetual suffering. My reading will move between Homer, Sophocles, Aeschylus, Aristophanes, Ovid, and contemporary artworks, and between philosophy, psychoanalysis and trauma theory.
For Teams access: